Ramirez v. U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 43 U.S.C. § 1782 · 5 U.S.C. § 101 (Accountant, Compliance, and Enforcement Staffing Act of 2003) · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 701 · 5 U.S.C. § 704 · 5 U.S.C. § 706 · 6 U.S.C. § 111 · 6 U.S.C. § 279
Relies on Lujan v. National Wildlife Federation · Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Bennett v. Spear · Honig v. Doe · Weinberger v. Romero-Barcelo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Campbell-Ewald Co. , 136 S.Ct. at 669 (quoting Chafin v. Chafin , 568 U.S. 165 , 172, 133 S.Ct. 1017 , 185 L.Ed.2d 1 (2013) ); see also Knox v. Serv. Emps. Int'l Union, Local 1000 , 567 U.S. 298 , 307, 132 S.Ct. 2277 , 183 L.Ed.2d 281 (2012) (”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he prospect of pervasive oversight by federal courts over the manner ... of agency compliance with such congressional directives is not contemplated by the APA.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(quoting Erie v. Pap's A.M. , 529 U.S. 277 , 287, 120 S.Ct. 1382 , 146 L.Ed.2d 265 (2000) ) ). A”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.