310 Ga. App. 637 - Moses v. Jordan’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 226 Ga. App. 459 - Matjoulis v. Integon General Ins. Corp. · 55 Cal. 2d 192 - Page v. Page · 250 Ga. App. 356 - Taylor v. Powertel, Inc. · 239 Ga. App. 282 - Parks v. Multimedia Technologies, Inc. · 199 Ga. App. 434 - Arford v. Blalock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Even though a partner has a right to dissolve the partnership, if ... it is proved that the partner acted in bad faith and violated his fiduciary duties by attempting to appropriate to his own use the ... prosperity of the partnership without adequate compensation to his co-partner, the dissolution would be wrongful and the partner would be liable as provided by the section of the Uniform Partnership Act defining the rights of partners upon wrongful dissolution for violation of the implied agreement not to exclude the other partner wrongfully from the partnership business opportunity." [Cit.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jordan v. Moses“Upon dissolution of a partnership the partners cease to be associated in the carrying on of the partnership. The partnership shall continue until termination pursuant to Code Section 14-8-30 and until termination the partners shall be associated in the winding up of the partnership.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jordan v. Moses“crucial element of a wrongful dissolution claim [is that] the partner's decision to dissolve must be wrongful. Stated differently, the power to dissolve must be exercised in good faith.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jordan v. Moses
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.