Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 Ga. App. 64 - Marshall v. Browning

310 Ga. App. 64 - Marshall v. Browning’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cameron v. Lang · 292 Ga. App. 702 - Selvy v. Morrison · 264 Ga. App. 83 - Reed v. DeKalb County · 301 Ga. App. 885 - Valades v. Uslu · 258 Ga. App. 159 - Anderson v. Cobb

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “actual malice requires a deliberate intention to do wrong and denotes express malice or malice in fact. Actual malice does not include implied malice, or the reckless disregard for the rights and safety of others. A deliberate intention to do wrong such as to constitute the actual malice necessary to overcome official immunity must be the intent to cause the harm suffered by the plaintiffs. Likewise, the phrase “actual intent to cause injury” has been defined in a tort context to mean an actual intent to cause harm to the plaintiff, not merely an intent to do the act purportedly resulting in the claimed injury. This definition of intent contains aspects of malice, perhaps a wicked or evil motive.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “To prevail at summary judgment, the moving party must demonstrate that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the evidence and all reasonable inferences and conclusions drawn therefrom, viewed in the nonmovant’s favor, warrant judgment as a matter of law. We review de novo the trial court’s ruling on a motion for summary judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.