Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 ILL 558 - People v. Love

People v. Love’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
8
states following
October 1997
most recently cited

38 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently October 1997 · most notably Kneeland v. Emerton (1932), People v. Dolgin (1953)

38 state decisions

9019231930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. McBride · Stewart v. Brady · Johnson v. Pendergast · People v. Beck · People ex rel. Hillel Lodge No. 72 v. Rose

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no one has any vested right in a rule of evidence either in a criminal or civil case, and there is no constitutional prohibition against the legislature changing it so long as it leaves to a party either in a criminal or civil case a fair opportunity to make his defense and to submit all the facts to the jury”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.