Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 ILL 585 - Robar v. Isham

Robar v. Isham’s Empirical Analysis

1924

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 1982
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Vincent v. McElvain · Ames v. Witbeck

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is a well settled principle of law that where parties to a written contract mutually consent and acquiesce in the oral modifications and in the non-performance of certain provisions thereof and later comply with the other terms of the contract, each party is estopped to deny the efficacy of the modifying agreement and cannot set up such non-compliance of provisions thus waived in order to defeat specific performance, provided the proof is strong that such waiver or modifications have been assented to.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.