Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 Ill. App. 582 - Palmer v. Miller

310 Ill. App. 582 - Palmer v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis

1941

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
March 1971
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 1971

16 state decisions

601941195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Reivitz v. Chicago Rapid Transit Co. · McNulty ex rel. McNulty v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. · Burns v. Smith · Atchison, T. &. S. F. Ry. Co. v. McNulty · O'Neal v. Caffarello

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““By the weight of authority, the owner-of a motor vehicle, present therein at the time of an accident caused by its negligent operation, is liable for injuries resulting though he is not personally at the wheel; the car being driven by one not his servant, but with his permission and in the business of the owner or in a joint enterprise of the owner and the driver. “Where an owner is riding in an automobile which is being driven by another in an improper manner, and the evidence does not show a contractual surrender nor, an abandonment of the owner’s right tó control, the inference is warranted that the owner knew of and permitted the improper operation and he is deemed to have consented to the negligent operation of the machine and the driver’s negligence is imputed to him; and if an owner permits some other person to operate his car in which he is riding, whether his wife, child or a friend, retaining such control of the car as gives him unrestricted right of direction and control, he will be liable for the driver’s negligence.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.