Central Trust Co. v. Rudnick’s Empirical Analysis
1941
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2012
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Clark v. State Street Trust Co. · Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. Commonwealth · Crimmins & Peirce Co. v. Kidder Peabody Acceptance Corp. · Capen v. Garrison · Acer v. . Hotchkiss
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the transaction of business through one known to be a straw is persuasive evidence that the parties did not intend that any personal liability was to be assumed by the person for whom the straw was acting.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lee v. Ravanis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.