Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 Mich. 516 - Hatch v. Maple Valley Township

Hatch v. Maple Valley Township’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 2013
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Coit v. City of Grand Rapids · Peacock v. Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee Railway Co. · McCurdy v. County of Shiawassee · East Jordan Lumber Co. v. Village of East Jordan · Elliott v. Secretary of State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In McCurdy ..., plaintiff sought to recover against Shiawassee county on certain promissory notes given by the treasurer of the county pursuant to a resolution to borrow the money, passed by the board of supervisors. The board of supervisors had no power to borrow money for current expenses. Lacking such powers, the action of the board was held to be ultra vires. It was not an attempt to act within its powers, merely carried out in an unlawful manner. The power to act was lacking in the first place.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.