Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 Minn. 211 - State v. Witt

State v. Witt’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
8
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently May 2014 · most notably State v. Via (1985), State v. Adams (1980)

2 federal appellate · 48 state decisions

30019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neil v. Biggers · State v. Pehrson · People v. Hernandez · State v. Watts · State v. Fairmont Creamery Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]e do not condone these unnecessarily suggestive procedures. If suspicion has focused on a particular individual and his picture is shown to the complainant along with others but the complainant does not identify the picture, a subsequent lineup, even though otherwise proper, is open to question when that individual is the only person in the lineup whose picture has recently been shown to the complainant. It would be a better practice in such a situation to eliminate the use of photos and proceed directly to the lineup, or to include in the group of pictures shown at least one or more pictures of persons other than the suspect who also subsequently appear in the lineup.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The sole limitation which the equal protection clause imposes upon the legislature in the exercise of this power is that criminal statutes must not prescribe different punishments for the same acts committed under the same circumstances by persons in like situations.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.