State v. Horner’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
107 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 107 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably State v. Smith (1985), State v. Blakeney (2000)
107 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brinegar v. United States · United States v. Ventresca · In re Kauffman Mutual Fund Actions · State v. Odom · State v. Vestal
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 107 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Findings and conclusions are required in order that there may be a meaningful appellate review of the decision' on a motion to suppress.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“the judge did not make a ruling on the motion in court during the term, but signed the order after the term had expired.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“[e]ffective appellate review is not thwarted by the subsequent order.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.