Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 N.C. 418 - State v. Van Higson

State v. Van Higson’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
3
states following
March 2012
most recently cited

42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 42 later decisions — most recently March 2012 · most notably State v. Brown (1987), 498 So. 2d 863 - Whitehead v. State (1986)

42 state decisions

3201984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ahearn · State v. Blackwelder · State v. Chatman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n every case in which the sentencing judge is required to make findings in aggravation and mitigation to support a sentence which varies from the presumptive term, each offense, whether consolidated for hearing or not, must be treated separately, and separately supported by findings tailored to the individual offense and applicable only to that offense.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We do not agree, however, that under the facts of this case it is relevant to consider as a separate aggravating factor that ‘defendant’s conduct during the crimes indicates a serious threat of violence.’ Here, the defendant pled guilty to second degree murder and to assault with a deadly weapon with intent to kill inflicting serious injury. Both crimes, by definition, are crimes of violence. Presumably the threat of violence inherent in these crimes was considered in determining the presumptive sentences for the offenses. (Emphasis added.) (Citations omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.