Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 N.C. 581 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably State v. Worsley (1994), 145 N.C. App. 570 - State v. Harris (2001)

27 state decisions

1101984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Payton v. New York · Steagald v. United States · United States v. Santana · Dorman v. United States · State v. Booker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “voir dire evidence and the trial judge's findings [were] insufficient to permit adequate review by the appellate courts”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “while in this case, it is evident that, at the time of entry into defendant's home, [the officer] was engaged in the "hot pursuit" of a person he suspected to be a fugitive, the issue remains as to whether there was an unjustified delay or failure to obtain a search warrant after the existence of probable cause as to the whereabouts of the suspects.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “it appears to be the essence of `exigent circumstances' that there was `the lack of time to obtain a warrant without thwarting the arrest or making it more dangerous.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.