Sturdevant v. SAE Warehouse, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 2018
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Sturdevant v. SAE Warehouse, Inc. · Schnell v. Schnell · Small v. Burleigh County · State Bank of Towner, Inc. v. Rauh
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect; (2) newly discovered evidence that, with reasonable diligence, could not have been discovered in time to move for a new trial under Rule 59(b); (3) fraud (whether previously called intrinsic or extrinsic), misrepresentation, or misconduct by an opposing party; (4) the judgment is void; (5) the judgment has been satisfied, released, or discharged; it is based on an earlier judgment that has been reversed or vacated; or applying it prospectively is no longer equitable; or (6) any other reason that justifies relief.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Anderson v. Baker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.