Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 NW2D 89 - State v. Walker

State v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
January 2012
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently January 2012

22 state decisions

1801981199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · State v. Jones · United States v. Juarez · State v. Matteson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although it is commonly stated that uncorroborated eyewitness identification testimony of a-single witness is sufficient to support a guilty verdict, we have recognized that not all single eyewitness cases are the same and have emphasized that when the single witness’ identification of a defendant is made after only fleeting or limited observation, corroboration is required if the conviction is to be sustained. State v. Spann, 287 N.W.2d 406, 407-408 (Minn.1979).”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.