State v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently June 2019 · most notably State v. Carlson (1991), State v. Walton (1991)
4 federal appellate · 44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Berkemer v. McCarty · Massiah v. United States · Oregon v. Elstad · Oregon v. Mathiason
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[i]n determining whether Miranda -like warnings were required by the Oregon Constitution, we must assess the extent to which defendant was `in custody.' In Oregon, a defendant who is in `full custody' must be given Miranda -like warnings prior to questioning."”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage“[J]urors are assumed to have followed their instructions, absent an overwhelming probability that they would be unable to do so.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kitzman · State v. Isom“ORS 163.150(1), which sets forth the evidence that may be considered in the penalty phase, is to be interpreted broadly, to include even unadjudicated bad acts.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Moore · State v. Tucker
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.