Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

310 Or. 283

State ex rel. Roberts v. McConville

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 13, 1990

Oregon Supreme Court · decided 1990-09-13

Decided 1990-09-13

GILLETTE, J.,

¶1dissenting.

¶2I would issue an alternative writ of mandamus, and therefore dissent from the majority’s decision to the contrary.

¶3While the analysis in the separate dissent of Fadeley, J., may be correct, I see no need to go into the merits here. For me, it is sufficient that a vital interest of the electorate is affected by the decisions of the trial court and there is no time for the normal appellate process to be carried out. I mean no disrespect to the two able trial judges whose decisions are at issue here when I say that, if at all possible, the people of this state are entitled to be assured by this court that those decisions are correct.

¶4I respectfully dissent.

/310/or/283 · .json · Public domain