Schuessler v. Wolter’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 85 Wis. 2d 675 - Anderson v. Continental Insurance · 23 Cal. 4th 390 - International Insurance v. American Empire Surplus Lines Insurance · FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Public Service Co. · Burns v. McGraw-Hill Broadcasting Co., Inc. · Armentrout v. FMC Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Where the motion concerns a question of fact, we consider whether the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party, compels the conclusion that reasonable jurors could not disagree and that no evidence or inference [therefrom] has been received at trial upon which a verdict against the moving party could be sustained.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The record is clear that [defendant] adequately raised the issue in its evidentiary presentation, in its closing argument, and in its motion for new trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Shifrin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.