Davis v. People’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent v. Wayne Robert STEWART, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner. · State v. Elnicki · People v. Gladney · Tevlin v. People · People v. Gaffney
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a detective may testify about his or her assessments of interviewee credibility when that testimony is offered to provide context for the detective's interrogation tactics and investigative decisions.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“consider whether any error, in light of the entire record of the trial, substantially influenced the verdict or impaired the fairness of the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Hard“Unless a limiting instruction is either required by statute or requested by a party, a trial court has no duty to provide one sua sponte.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.