310 So. 2d 319
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 25, 1975
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1975-03-25
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1978
2 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“We think that the question is fully answered in the negative by the holding and the reasoning of the Supreme Court of Florida in Estevez v. State, Fla. 1975, 313 So.2d 692 .”
quoted by 1 later decision, including 338 So. 2d 556 - Johnson v. State
Relies on 313 So. 2d 692 - Estevez v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1975-03-25
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1The controlling question on this appeal is:
Whether the trial court erred in imposing upon the defendant separate sentences for rape and unlawful possession of a firearm while engaged in a criminal offense where both charges arose out of the same transaction.
¶2We think that the question is fully answered in the negative by the holding and the reasoning of the Supreme Court of Florida in Estevez v. State, Fla.1975, 313 So.2d 692.
¶3Affirmed.