Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 SO2D 37 - Beasley v. State

Beasley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
May 1982
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 290 So. 2d 116 - Singletary v. State · 140 So. 2d 597 - State Ex Rel. Roberts v. Cochran · 207 So. 2d 459 - Hooks v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “no provision of constitution, statute, or court rule requires it and the trial judge did not err in denying the appellant's motion for a jury trial on the issue of identity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a trial judge would have authority to use an advisory jury to determine a disputed issue of fact, such as identity, in a revocation hearing,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(t)his question should be laid to rest ... (and) thought ... (that it) had done so in the case of Singletary v. State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.