Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

310 So. 2d 426

Heintzelman's Ford, Inc. v. Calvin

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1975-04-08

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1981

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1975-04-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1This petition for writ of certiorari seeks reversal of the respondent’s order granting the issuance of a motor vehicle dealer’s license to Mclnerney Ford, Inc.

¶2We have heard oral argument in this cause and have carefully examined the record and the briefs submitted by the parties, as well as the brief of the Amicus Curiae. Upon our consideration thereof, we conclude that respondent’s order is supported by substantial, competent evidence and was entered pursuant to lawful procedures and authority.

¶3Petitioners having failed to demonstrate grounds for the relief sought, the petition for writ of certiorari is denied.

RAWLS, C. J., and JOHNSON and MILLS, JJ., concur.
/310/so2d/426 · .json · Public domain