Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 So. 2d 528 - State v. Williams

310 So. 2d 528 - State v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
October 1999
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently October 1999 · most notably State v. Prestridge (1981), Guice v. Fortenberry (1981)

1 federal appellate · 24 state decisions

140197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Wade · Simmons v. United States · Costello v. United States · Taylor v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Members of the grand jury, all other persons present at a grand jury meeting, and all persons having confidential access to information concerning grand jury proceedings, shall keep secret the testimony of witnesses and all other matters occurring at, or directly connected with, a meeting of the grand jury. However, after the indictment, such persons may reveal statutory irregularities in grand jury proceedings to defense counsel, the attorney general, the district attorney, or the court, and may testify concerning them. Such persons may disclose testimony given before the grand jury, at any time when permitted by the court, to show that a witness committed perjury in his testimony before the grand jury. A witness may discuss his testimony given before the grand jury with counsel for a person under investigation or indicted, with the attorney general or the district attorney, or with the court.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “the State does not have to open its files to the defendant and allow the defendant to search and decide what is exculpatory.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.