Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 So. 2d 544 - State v. Martin

310 So. 2d 544 - State v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
July 2012
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently July 2012 · most notably 668 So. 2d 1132 - State v. Cummings (1996), 412 So. 2d 507 - State v. Humphrey (1982)

31 state decisions

10019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Harriss · State v. Truby · State v. Dundas · 310 So. 2d 89 - State v. Lindsey · State v. Wiggins

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Distribute" means to deliver a controlled dangerous substance whether by physical delivery, administering, subterfuge, furnishing a prescription, or by filling, packaging, labeling or compounding the substance pursuant to the lawful order of a practitioner. "Distributor" means a person who delivers a controlled dangerous substance as herein defined.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Hutchins · State v. Hall
  2. “[i]t is not competent to impeach a witness as to collateral facts or irrelevant matter.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Wagster · 345 So. 2d 443 - State v. Cappo
  3. “"This Court has often held that a party who elicits from a witness on cross-examination testimony as to a collateral matter cannot contradict that testimony by the production of other witnesses. The rule is designed to avoid unnecessarily prolonging trial by extended inquiries into extraneous matters."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. 345 So. 2d 443 - State v. Cappo

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.