Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 SO2D 550 - Eubanks v. Brasseal

Eubanks v. Brasseal’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently February 2019 · most notably Mart v. Hill (1987), 627 So. 2d 1358 - Stapleton v. Great Lakes Chemical Corp. (1993)

36 state decisions

22019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 13 Cal. 3d 804 - Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co. · Dixie Drive It Yourself System New Orleans Co. v. American Beverage Co. · 280 So. 2d 431 - Hoffman v. Jones · 114 So. 2d 791 - Duval v. Thomas · 204 So. 2d 83 - Barnes v. Toye Brothers Yellow Cab Company

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicle and the traffic upon and the condition of the highway.”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “This interpretation rests in the settled theory that, where a traffic law is designed to protect life and property, it is a safety measure, the violation of which is negligence per se and is actionable if it was a legal cause of the collision.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a following motorist who strikes a preceding motorist from the rear is presumed to have breached the standard of conduct prescribed in R.S. 32:81 and, hence, is presumed negligent.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.