Kelso v. Wheeler’s Empirical Analysis
1958
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 2009
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Dyche v. Simmons · LaForce v. Bracken · 47 Tex. Civ. App. 259 - McDonald v. McCrabb · Texas Creosoting Co. v. Hartburg Lumber Co. · Southland Life Ins. Co. v. Hopkins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It has been held that an amended answer or amended petition is not in supplement of the pleading it amends and is not to be taken into consideration along with it. The amendment completely supplants the pleading it amends. See Dyche v. Simmons, Tex.Civ.App., 264 S.W.2d 208 , writ refused, n. r. e.; Ward v. Wingate, Tex.Civ.App.1955, 280 S.W.2d 938 ; Hawkins v. Collier, Tex.Civ.App.1951, 235 S.W.2d 528 ; Hunt v. Employers Reinsurance Corporation, Tex.Civ.App., 219 S.W.2d 483 , error refused, n. r. e.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.