Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 S.W.2d 952 - State v. Butler

State v. Butler’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

51
cited by 51 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably State v. Turner (1981), State v. Cobb (1969)

51 state decisions

2101958196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Jones · State v. Tiedt · State v. Foster · State v. Whitaker · State v. Chernick

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . .In order to sustain a conviction for breaking the county jail and escaping it is not necessary to prove that the defendant personally cut the bars of the jail door. Defendant was charged singly and in joint concert with breaking the county jail and escaping. It is well settled that; party may be charged with the commission of the felony and be held under such charge for being present and participating in concert with the others in the commission of the crime, or for being present and aiding and assisting another in doing it. It is not necessary that he, personally, have done all the things which together make up the elements of the crime. State v. Sheard, Mo.Sup., 276 S.W.2d 196 , certiorari denied, 352 U.S. 849 , 77 S.Ct. 68 , 1 L.Ed.2d 60 ; State v. Whitaker, Mo.Sup., 275 S.W.2d 316 ; State v. Chernick, Mo.Sup., 278 S.W.2d 741 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.