Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 SW3D 319 - State v. Rottinghaus

State v. Rottinghaus’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Foucha v. Louisiana · Jones v. United States · State v. Storey · State v. Tooley · State v. Aaron

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) Whether or not the committed person presently has a mental disease or defect; (2) The nature of the offense for which the committed person was committed; (3) The committed person's behavior while confined in a mental health facility; (4) The elapsed time between the hearing and the last reported unlawful or dangerous act; (5) Whether the person has had conditional releases without incident; and (6) Whether the determination that the committed person is not dangerous to himself or others is dependent on the person's taking drugs, medicine or narcotics.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.