Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

310 S.W.3d 712

Hensley v. URSULINE ACADEMY

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 2010

Missouri Court of Appeals · decided 2010-03-30

Decided 2010-03-30

¶1 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2 Patricia Hensley appeals from the trial court’s grant of Ursuline Academy, Kirk-wood, Missouri’s motion for summary judgment on her petition for libel and slander. This Court has reviewed the Motion taken with the case. Respondent’s Motion *713 to Dismiss Appellant’s Appeal or Alternatively to Strike Portions of Appellant’s Brief is denied.

¶3 No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

¶4 We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

/310/sw3d/712 · .json · Public domain