¶1 ORDER
¶2 Patrick Coyne (Defendant) appeals the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of stealing and third-degree assault.
¶3 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
¶4 The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.26(b).