Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 S.W.3d 890 - Perez v. State

Perez v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston))

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Thompson v. State · Moore v. State · Butler v. State · Salinas v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “physical impossibility of a defendant's guilt by placing the defendant in a location other than the scene of the crime at the relevant time”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “It will not suffice for [a]ppellant to show 'that the errors had some conceivable effect on the outcome of the proceeding.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “questionable whether this even functions as an alibi defense”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.