Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 U.S. 106 - Carlson v. People of State of California

Carlson v. People of State of California’s Empirical Analysis

310 U.S. 106 · 1940

Citation profile

472
cited by 472 later decisions
33
cited 33 times by the Supreme Court
35
states following
July 2009
most recently cited

51 federal appellate · 25 district · 314 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 472 later decisions (33 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2009 · most notably Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley (1972), Dennis v. United States (1951)

51 federal appellate · 25 district · 314 state decisions — followed in 35 states

25701940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Thornhill v. Alabama · Schneider v. State · Lovell v. City of Griffin · Stromberg v. People of State of California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 472 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The power and duty of the State to take adequate steps to preserve the peace and protect the privacy, the lives, and the property of its residents cannot be doubted.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “sweeping and inexact terms of the ordinance disclose the threat to freedom of speech inherent in its existence,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““* * * publicizing the facts of a labor dispute in a peaceful way through appropriate means, whether by pamphlet, by word of mouth or by banner, must now be regarded as within that liberty of communication which is secured to every person by the Fourteenth Amendment against abridgment by a state.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.