Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 310 U.S. 530 - White v. Texas

White v. Texas’s Empirical Analysis

310 U.S. 530 · 1940

Citation profile

253
cited by 253 later decisions
37
cited 37 times by the Supreme Court
20
states following
May 2003
most recently cited

68 federal appellate · 6 district · 95 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 253 later decisions (37 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2003 · most notably Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera (1966), Oregon v. Elstad (1985)

68 federal appellate · 6 district · 95 state decisions — followed in 20 states

12001940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Chambers v. Florida · Canty v. Alabama · American Manufacturing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board · Connor v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 253 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““But regardless of petitioner’s testimony on this question, the State insisted and offered testimony to establish that the confession was signed by him and upon this evidence the confession was submitted to the jury for the purpose of obtaining his conviction. Since, therefore, the confession was presented by the State to the jury as that of petitioner, we must determine whether the record shows that, if signed at all, the confession was obtained and used in such manner that petitioner’s trial fell short of that procedural due process guaranteed by the Constitution.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.