Hogan v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

36 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(1) The seriousness of the offense, and whether violence was employed by the juvenile in the commission of the offense; (2) Whether the offense is part of a repetitive pattern of adjudicated offenses which would lead to the determination that the juvenile is beyond rehabilitation under existing rehabilitation programs, as evidenced by past efforts to treat and rehabilitate the juvenile and the response to such efforts; and (3) The prior history, character traits, mental maturity, and any other factor which reflects upon the juvenile’s prospects for rehabilitation.”

   4 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. Davis v. State · Green v. State

2. “The fact that no commitment under juvenile jurisdiction could result from a transfer due to Hogan's age and the fact there are multiple charges of a serious nature, one of which involves possession of a significant amount of crack cocaine on school grounds, compel us to conclude that the trial court's decision was not clearly erroneous.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Heagerty v. State

3. “1. The seriousness of the offense and whether it involved violence. 2. Whether it is part of a repetitive pattern and whether the juvenile is beyond rehabilitation as a juvenile. 3. The prior history, character traits, mental maturity, and any other factor which reflects upon prospects for rehabilitation.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Johnson v. State