Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 311 ARK 609 - Thomas v. State

Thomas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1993

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
March 2003
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Lukach v. State · Shaw v. State · Summerlin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In reaching our conclusion, we emphasize the fact that appellant continued to remove the victim from the point of their initial contact after she expressed a desire to be returned to the agreed-upon destination. Appellant did not rape the victim at the point of initial contact as was the case in Summerlin, 296 Ark. 347 , 756 S.W.2d 908 , nor at the point where the victim revoked her consent to appellant’s actions as was the case in Shaw, 304 Ark. 381 , 802 S.W.2d 468 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.