Smith v. Juhan’s Empirical Analysis
311 F.2d 670 · 1962
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 3 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 2015
5 federal appellate · 3 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Ohio Power Co. · Moog Industries, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission · In re Burr Mfg. & Supply Co. · Breeding Motor Freight Lines, Inc. v. Reconstruction Finance Corp. · Morrison v. Burnette
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The rule is settled, and it seems to be universally approved, that after confirmation of a judicial sale neither inadequacy of price, nor offers of better ;prices, nor anything but fraud, accident, mistake, or some other cause for which equity would avoid a like sale between private parties, will warrant a court in avoiding the confirmation of a sale or in opening the latter and receiving subsequent bids. (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.