Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

311 F.2d 777

Docket No. 17165.

Mitchell v. United States

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Dec. 12, 1962.

Decided Dec. 27, 1962.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1962-12-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1962

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1962-12-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. Harvey B. Bolton, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. William H. Clarke, Washington, D. C. (appointed by this court), was on the brief, for appellant.

¶2*778Mr. William H. Willcox, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. David C. Acheson, U. S. Atty., and Frank Q. Nebeker and Victor W. Caputy, Asst. U. S. Attys., were on the brief, for appellee.

¶3Before Wilbur K. Miller, Fahy and Wright, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5James O. Mitchell was observed by house detectives as he snatched a wallet from the purse of a woman in a crowded department store. He was immediately apprehended, and thereafter was indicted for robbery, tried and convicted.

¶6On appeal, diligent counsel appointed to represent appellant complain that the detectives were permitted to testify they saw Mitchell touch the purses of other women in the store just before he was seen robbing the complaining witness. They say this was reversible error. We do not agree.

¶7Affirmed.

/311/f2d/777 · .json · Public domain