In re Cabletron Systems Inc’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
82 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 149 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2025 · most notably Daou Systems Inc v. V W (2005), Janus Capital Group, Inc. v. First Derivative Traders (2011)
82 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Basic Inc. v. Levinson · TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc. · Messenger v. Anderson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 149 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“involves an evaluation, inter alia, of the level of detail provided by the confidential sources, the corroborative nature of the other facts alleged (including from other sources), the coherence and plausibility of the allegations, the number of sources, the reliability of the sources, and similar indicia.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“A fact is material if it is substantially likely that the disclosure of the omitted fact would have been viewed by the reasonable investor as having significantly altered the “total mix” of information made available. Information which would have assumed actual significance in the deliberations of a reasonable shareholder is material. In general, the materiality of a statement or omission is a question of fact that should normally be left to a jury rather than resolved by the court on a motion to dismiss. Thus, we review the complaint only to determine that it pleads the existence of such statements and presents a plausible jury question of materiality.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'[C]atch-all allegations' which merely assert motive and opportunity, without something more, fail to satisfy the PSLRA.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.