Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 311 F.3d 46 - Lattimore v. Dubois

Lattimore v. Dubois’s Empirical Analysis

311 F.3d 46 · 2002

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
May 2019
most recently cited

20 federal appellate · 27 district ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Murray v. Carrier · Lindh v. Murphy · Duncan v. Walker · Grupo Mexicano Desarrollos v. Alliance Bond Fund Inc

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A 1-year period of limitation shall apply to a motion under this section. The limitation period shall run from the latest of— (1) the date on which the judgment of conviction becomes final; (2) the date on which the impediment to making a motion created by governmental action in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States is removed, if the movant was prevented from making a motion by such government action; (3) the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court, if that right has been newly recognized by the Supreme Court and made retroactively applicable to cases on collateral review; or (4) the date on which the facts supporting the claim or claims presented could have been discovered through the exercise of due diligence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Santana v. United States · 939 F. Supp. 2d 109 - Berroa Santana v. United States
  2. “[a]ppellate counsel is not required to raise every non-frivolous claim”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. Taylor v. Medeiros

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.