Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 311 F.3d 488 - Arbitration Between Monegasque De Reassurances Sam v. Nak Naftogaz of Ukraine

Arbitration Between Monegasque De Reassurances Sam v. Nak Naftogaz of Ukraine’s Empirical Analysis

311 F.3d 488 · 2002

Citation profile

103
cited by 103 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

28 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 103 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2024 · most notably Sinochem International Co. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corp. (2007), In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability Litigation (2007)

28 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

650200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Gulf Oil Corporation v. Gilbert · Piper Aircraft Co. v. Reyno · Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · Scherk v. Alberto-Culver Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 103 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “does not raise a jurisdictional bar but instead involves a deliberate abstention from the exercise of jurisdiction.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[T]he greater the [petitioner’s] or the lawsuit’s bona fide connection to the United States and to the forum of choice and the more it appears that considerations of convenience favor the conduct of the lawsuit in the United States, the more difficult it will be for the defendant to gain dismissal for forum non conveniens .... On the other hand, the more it appears that the [petitioner’s] choice of a U.S. forum was motivated by forum-shopping reasons ... the less deference the plaintiffs choice commands....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a case where the alternative forum is characterized by a complete absence of due process or an inability of the forum to provide substantial justice to the parties.” Monegasque, 311 F.3d at 499 (finding that”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.