Gueldner v. Heyd’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 1995
8 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314
Relies on Johnson v. Zerbst · Townsend v. Sain · Powell v. State of Alabama Patterson · Brown v. Allen · Hamilton v. Alabama
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Therefore, we conclude that the objection of duplicity was not timely raised before the trial, and therefore petitioners have waived this defense. See State v. Richard, 245 La. 465 , 158 So.2d 828 (1964); State v. Blankenship, 231 La. 993 , 93 So.2d 533 (1957).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Defraites
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.