Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 311 FSUPP 1397 - Ringley v. Cox

Ringley v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
March 1970
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Douglas v. People of State of California · McKane v. Durston · Peyton v. King · Nelson v. Peyton · Tucker v. Peyton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. The party or parties taking the appeal ; 2. The judgment, order of part thereof appealed from; and 3. The court (United States Court of peals for the Fourth Circuit) to which the appeal is taken.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.