311 F. Supp. 2d 838 - Gerlinger v. Amazon. Com, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 18 (§ 7 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914) · 15 U.S.C. § 2 (§ 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corporation · First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co. · United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Interpretation of a contract is a purely legal question which is susceptible to a motion for judgment on the pleadings.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[a]n action based on quasi-contract cannot lie where a valid express contract covering the same subject matter exists between the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“cannot assert his unjust enrichment claim in the alternative”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.