311 F. Supp. 3d 5 - Ctr. for Responsible Sci. v. Gottlieb’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Papasan v. Allain · Herbert v. National Academy of Sciences · Victor H. Sparrow, Iii, v. United Air Lines, Inc., et al. · Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug Administration
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the benefit of all inferences that can be derived from the facts alleged,”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“Am. Compl., ¶ 204. Once again, Defendant has filed a Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) because, the Agency says, CRS's Amended Complaint still does not establish that it has Article III standing. So once more into the breach of organizational standing ventures the Court. This time, like King Henry V's final assault on Harfleur, proves the last. Despite its renewed efforts, CRS's alleged injury does not clear Article III's bar, which precludes it from maintaining this challenge. II. Legal Standard In evaluating Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, the Court must”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The Court need not accept as true, however, a legal conclusion couched as a factual allegation, nor an inference unsupported by the facts set forth in the Complaint.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.