Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 311 Ga. App. 206 - Hudson v. State

311 Ga. App. 206 - Hudson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 229 Ga. App. 532 - Snow v. State · 257 Ga. App. 164 - Frank v. State · 304 Ga. App. 445 - Jones v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “OCGA § 17-7-170 (a) pertinently sets forth the required form of a statutory speedy trial demand: A demand for speedy trial filed pursuant to this Code section shall be filed as a separate, distinct, and individual document and shall not be a part of any other pleading or document. Such demand shall clearly be titled “Demand for Speedy Trial”; reference this Code section within the pleading; and identify the indictment number or accusation number for which such demand is being made[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “and it otherwise complied with the pleading requirements of OCGA § 17-7-170 (a) ). Uribe asserts that the text of his demand was sufficient to constitute a statutory speedy trial demand, that the caption or title of the motion must be read in conjunction with the text, that he was not required to use the exact title”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.