311 Ill. App. 3d 1042 - People v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

18 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““Foster teaches that when a guilty plea defendant is not told of the Rule 604(d) prerequisites to an appeal, the appellate court cannot dismiss for lack of jurisdiction but must instead remand for proceedings consistent with Rule 604(d). The supreme court’s reasoning is instructive: ‘Since a defendant’s failure to comply with the written-motion requirements of Rule 604(d) can result in the loss of the right to direct appeal, this court adopted Rule 605(b) as a necessary corollary to Rule 604(d). [Citation.] Rule 605(b) mandates that trial judges admonish defendants regarding the requirements of Rule 604(d), thus ensuring that the ramifications of noncompliance comport with due process. [Citation.] Having been instructed regarding Rule 604(d)’s mandates, a defendant cannot then argue procedural unfairness when he suffers the ramifications of his noncompliance.’ (Emphasis added.) [Citation.]” Wright, 311 Ill. App. 3d at 1047 , 725 N.E.2d at 815 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 323 Ill. App. 3d 77 - People v. Bates

2. “stems from the dictates of good practice rather than constitutional command”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 213 Ill. 2d 509 - People v. Breedlove