311 Ill. App. 3d 162 - People v. Stack’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2025
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wainwright v. Greenfield · 101 Ill. 2d 443 - People v. Ward · 123 Ill. 2d 113 - People v. Harris · 152 Ill. 2d 133 - People v. Pasch · 101 Ill. 2d 147 - People v. Silagy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“ha[d] not presented a compelling argument for th[e] court to adopt [it] as a new exception to the rule of hearsay in Illinois.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“the present sense impression exception has not been adopted in Illinois”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.