Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 311 Kan. 403 - State v. Thomas

State v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

2020

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2024
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ultreras · State v. Salary · State v. Washington · State v. Macomber

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a reasonable person in the defendant's circumstances would have perceived the use of deadly force in self-defense as necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “requires a showing that the defendant sincerely believed it was necessary to kill to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to the defendant or a third person.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “defendant's use of force was not justified under either or both of two scenarios: (1) the defendant did not honestly believe the use of force was necessary under the circumstances, or (2) a reasonable person would not believe the use of force was necessary under the circumstances.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.