Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

311 Mich. 680

19 N.W.2d 333

Dvoracek v. Goldstein

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1945

Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1945-06-04

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1960

5 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1945-06-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Wiest, J.

¶1 (concurring m result). I concur in the result.

¶2 Plaintiff, a farmer, wanted a well-dispositioned horse and stated his want to defendant who represented to him that he had such a horse. On such representation, which under the circumstances constituted an express warranty, plaintiff purchased horse. The horse was a vicious brute and in ordinary farm use jumped upon and inflicted severe personal injuries upon plaintiff. Damages for such personal injuries flowed from defendant’s wrongful inducement to the purchase and use of the horse by plaintiff.

Starr, C. J., and Bushnell, J., concurred with Wiest, X
/311/mich/680 · .json · Public domain