Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 311 Minn. 166 - Susla v. State

Susla v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

97
cited by 97 later decisions
2
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 14 district · 79 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 97 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Pletan v. Gaines (1992), Cairl v. State (1982)

2 federal appellate · 14 district · 79 state decisions

54019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621 · Nieting v. Blondell · Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout · Hahn v. City of Ortonville · Heitman v. City of Lake City

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 97 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a public official charged by law with duties which call for the exercise of his judgment or discretion is not personally liable to an individual for damages unless he is guilty of a willful or malicious wrong.”
    14 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““We can conceive of no justification for applying the governmental-proprietary distinction to the activities of local governmental units in tort cases but not to the activities of the state, especially when it has been applied to the activities of the state in contract cases. Thus, we hold that the sovereign immunity of the State of. Minnesota from tort liability, as it existed up to the effective date of the Nieting decision and L.1976, c. 331, did not extend to suits on torts committed in its proprietary capacity.” Minn., 247 N.W.2d 910 .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.