Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 311 N.C. 573 - State v. Holloway

State v. Holloway’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
4
states following
March 2019
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably State v. Mercer (1986), State v. McQueen (1989)

31 state decisions

1301984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Campbell · State v. Satterfield · State v. MacCia · 16 N.C. App. 1 - State v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[B]y failing to comply with statutory requirements set forth in N.C.G.S. 15A-977 [defendants] waive their rights to contest on appeal the admission of evidence on constitutional or statutory grounds.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “4. The defendant is informed and believes and alleges on information and belief that the aforesaid Deputy Clerk of Superior Court of Wilkes County was not a “neutral and detached magistrate” as required to justify the issuance of the search warrant, State v. Miller, 16 N.C. App. 1 [ 190 S.E.2d 888 (1972)]; State v. Campbell, 282 N.C. 125 [ 191 S.E.2d 752 (1972)] and/or that the application for a search warrant was inadequate.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “to produce in as many cases as possible a summary granting or denial of the motion to suppress.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.